Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ CIC-Digitalarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
CIC-Digital
2020
Data sources: CIC-Digital
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

The TRUST Principles for digital repositories.

Authors: Lin, Dawei; Crabtree, Jonathan; Dillo, Ingrid; Downs, Robert R.; Edmunds, Rorie; Giaretta, David; De Giusti, Marisa Raquel; +12 Authors

The TRUST Principles for digital repositories.

Abstract

As information and communication technology has become pervasive in our society, we are increasingly dependent on both digital data and repositories that provide access to and enable the use of such resources. Repositories must earn the trust of the communities they intend to serve and demonstrate that they are reliable and capable of appropriately managing the data they hold. Following a year-long public discussion and building on existing community consensus1, several stakeholders, representing various segments of the digital repository community, have collaboratively developed and endorsed a set of guiding principles to demonstrate digital repository trustworthiness. Transparency, Responsibility, User focus, Sustainability and Technology: the TRUST Principles provide a common framework to facilitate discussion and implementation of best practice in digital preservation by all stakeholders. Refereed Best Practice Manual (incl. handbook, guide, cookbook etc)

Keywords

Ingenierías y Tecnologías, Certification, Data stewardship, :Cross-discipline [Parameter Discipline], :Data management planning and strategy development [Data Management Practices], Digital repositories, :Data archival/stewardship/curation [Data Management Practices], Data management

22 references, page 1 of 3

1. RDA/WDS Certicfiation of Digital Repositories IG. eTh TRUST Principles for Trustworthy Data Repositories - An Update. Research Data Alliance (RDA), https://www.rd-alliance.org/trust-principles-trustworthy-data-repositories-update (2019).

2. Mokrane, M. & Parsons, M. Learning from the International Polar Year to Build the Future of Polar Data Management. Data Sci. J. 13, IFPDA-15 (2014).

3. Wilkinson, M. D. et al. eTh FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci. Data 3, 160018 (2016).

4. Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems. Reference Model for an Open Archival Information System (OAIS). Recommended Practice CCSDS 650.0-M-2. Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems, https://public.ccsds.org/Pubs/650x0m2. pdf (2012).

5. Waters, D. & Garrett, J. Preserving Digital Information, Report of the Task Force on Archiving of Digital Information. 1400 16th St., NW, Suite 740, Washington, DC 20036-2217. 59 pp, https://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub63/ (1996).

6. CoreTrustSeal. CoreTrustSeal Certified Repositories. CoreTrustSeal , https://www.coretrustseal.org/why-certification/certifiedrepositories/ (2020).

7. Harmsen, H. et al. Explanatory notes on the Nestor seal for trustworthy digital archives. Nestor Certicfiation Working Group , http:// nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0008-2013100901 (2013).

8. Audit and Certicfiation of Trustworthy Digital Repositories. ISO 16363/CCSDS 652.0-M-1, https://public.ccsds.org/Pubs/652x0m1. pdf (2011).

9. Yakel, E., Faniel, I. M., Kriesberg, A. & Yoon, A. Trust in Digital Repositories. Int. J. Digit. Curation 8, 143-156 (2013).

10. Frank, R. D., Chen, Z., Crawford, E., Suzuka, K. & Yakel, E. Trust in qualitative data repositories. In Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology 54 102-111 Association for Information Science and Technology (2017).

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
  • citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    Powered byBIP!BIP!
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
moresidebar

Do the share buttons not appear? Please make sure, any blocking addon is disabled, and then reload the page.