Actions
  • shareshare
  • link
  • cite
  • add
add
auto_awesome_motion View all 2 versions
Other research product . 2020

The TRUST Principles for digital repositories

Lin, Dawei; Crabtree, Jonathan; Dillo, Ingrid; Downs, Robert R.; Edmunds, Rorie; Giaretta, David; De Giusti, Marisa; +12 Authors
Open Access
Published: 14 May 2020
Abstract

As information and communication technology has become pervasive in our society, we are increasingly dependent on both digital data and repositories that provide access to and enable the use of such resources. Repositories must earn the trust of the communities they intend to serve and demonstrate that they are reliable and capable of appropriately managing the data they hold. Following a year-long public discussion and building on existing community consensus1, several stakeholders, representing various segments of the digital repository community, have collaboratively developed and endorsed a set of guiding principles to demonstrate digital repository trustworthiness. Transparency, Responsibility, User focus, Sustainability and Technology: the TRUST Principles provide a common framework to facilitate discussion and implementation of best practice in digital preservation by all stakeholders. Refereed Best Practice Manual (incl. handbook, guide, cookbook etc)

Subjects

Ingenierías y Tecnologías, Certification, Digital repositories, Data stewardship, Data management, :Cross-discipline [Parameter Discipline], :Data archival/stewardship/curation [Data Management Practices], :Data management planning and strategy development [Data Management Practices]

22 references, page 1 of 3

1. RDA/WDS Certicfiation of Digital Repositories IG. eTh TRUST Principles for Trustworthy Data Repositories - An Update. Research Data Alliance (RDA), https://www.rd-alliance.org/trust-principles-trustworthy-data-repositories-update (2019).

2. Mokrane, M. & Parsons, M. Learning from the International Polar Year to Build the Future of Polar Data Management. Data Sci. J. 13, IFPDA-15 (2014).

3. Wilkinson, M. D. et al. eTh FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci. Data 3, 160018 (2016).

4. Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems. Reference Model for an Open Archival Information System (OAIS). Recommended Practice CCSDS 650.0-M-2. Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems, https://public.ccsds.org/Pubs/650x0m2. pdf (2012).

5. Waters, D. & Garrett, J. Preserving Digital Information, Report of the Task Force on Archiving of Digital Information. 1400 16th St., NW, Suite 740, Washington, DC 20036-2217. 59 pp, https://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub63/ (1996).

6. CoreTrustSeal. CoreTrustSeal Certified Repositories. CoreTrustSeal , https://www.coretrustseal.org/why-certification/certifiedrepositories/ (2020).

7. Harmsen, H. et al. Explanatory notes on the Nestor seal for trustworthy digital archives. Nestor Certicfiation Working Group , http:// nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0008-2013100901 (2013).

8. Audit and Certicfiation of Trustworthy Digital Repositories. ISO 16363/CCSDS 652.0-M-1, https://public.ccsds.org/Pubs/652x0m1. pdf (2011).

9. Yakel, E., Faniel, I. M., Kriesberg, A. & Yoon, A. Trust in Digital Repositories. Int. J. Digit. Curation 8, 143-156 (2013).

10. Frank, R. D., Chen, Z., Crawford, E., Suzuka, K. & Yakel, E. Trust in qualitative data repositories. In Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology 54 102-111 Association for Information Science and Technology (2017).

Download fromView all 2 sources
lock_open
moresidebar