Actions
  • shareshare
  • link
  • cite
  • add
add
auto_awesome_motion View all 2 versions
Publication . Article . 2016

Binding an event to its source at encoding improves children's source monitoring.

Kim P. Roberts; Angela D. Evans; Sara Duncanson;
Open Access
Published: 28 Oct 2016 Journal: Developmental psychology, volume 52, issue 12 (issn: 1939-0599, Copyright policy )
Abstract

Children learn information from a variety of sources and often remember the content but forget the source. Whereas the majority of research has focused on retrieval mechanisms for such difficulties, the present investigation examines whether the way in which sources are encoded influences future source monitoring. In Study 1, 86 children aged 3 to 8 years participated in 2 photography sessions on different days. Children were randomly assigned to either the Difference condition (they were asked to pay attention to differences between the 2 events), the Memory control condition (asked to pay attention with no reference to differences), or the No-Instruction control (no special instructions were given). One week later, during a structured interview about the photography session, the 3- to 4-year-olds in the No-Instruction condition were less accurate and responded more often with 'do not know' than the 7- to 8-year-olds. However, the older children in the Difference condition made more source confusions than the younger children suggesting improved memory for content but not source. In Study 2, the Difference condition was replaced by a Difference-Tag condition where details were pointed out along with their source (i.e., tagging source to content). Ninety-four children aged 3 to 8 years participated. Children in the Difference-Tag condition made fewer source-monitoring errors than children in the Control condition. The results of these 2 studies together suggest that binding processes at encoding can lead to better source discrimination of experienced events at retrieval and may underlie the rapid development of source monitoring in this age range. (PsycINFO Database Record

Subjects by Vocabulary

Microsoft Academic Graph classification: Memory control Psychology Structured interview Task analysis PsycINFO Control (linguistics) Developmental psychology Event (computing) Encoding (memory) Session (web analytics)

Subjects

Age Factors, Aging, Attention, Child, Child Development, Child, Preschool, Cognition, Female, Humans, Learning, Male, Life-span and Life-course Studies, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Demography

Funded by
NSERC
Project
  • Funder: Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
Download fromView all 3 sources
lock_open
moresidebar