You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
In-Season Weightlifting Training Exercise in Healthy Male Handball Players: Effects on Body Composition, Muscle Volume, Maximal Strength, and Ball-Throwing Velocity
Copyright policy )In-Season Weightlifting Training Exercise in Healthy Male Handball Players: Effects on Body Composition, Muscle Volume, Maximal Strength, and Ball-Throwing Velocity
0.16 L) were randomly allocated between experimental (EG) and control (CG) groups. Measures of one-repetition maximal strength included bench press, pull-over, snatch, and clean and jerk. Throwing velocity was investigated by standing, running, and jump throws, and the power of the upper limbs was estimated from the total distance of a 3-kg medicine ball overhead throw. Muscle volumes were estimated anthropometrically. Training sessions comprised 3&ndash
p2 = 0.920, with an almost 20% gain of muscle volume). It can be concluded that 8 weeks of biweekly in-season weightlifting training yielded substantial increases of muscle volume, maximal strength of the upper limbs, and ball throwing velocity in healthy handball players relative to their standard training program.
This study assessed the impact of 8 weeks biweekly in-season weightlifting training on the strength, throwing ability, and body composition of healthy male handball players. Twenty players (age: 21.2 ±
90% of 1RM (repetition maximum). Significant interaction effects (time x group) were found for all strength and throwing variables, ranging from &eta
d = 1.61) for the standing shot performance. Significant interaction effects were also detected for all anthropometric parameters (body mass: &eta
d = 6.65) and effect size (d = 6.44) for the medicine ball throw, and the smallest (about 23%, &Delta
p2 = 0.887 (medicine ball throw), with the largest between-group difference (more than 40%, &Delta
4 sets of explosive weightlifting exercise at 75%&ndash
1.4%, upper limb muscle volume: 3.16 ±
0.7 years, height: 1.83 ±
0.08 m, body mass: 83.3 ±
p2 = 0.595 (pull-over) to &eta
upper limb muscle volume: &eta
7.5 kg, body fat: 13.2 ±
body fat: &eta
p2 = 0.433
p2 = 0.391
- Keele University United Kingdom
- Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg
- Manouba University Tunisia
- University of Toronto Canada
- York University Canada
Medical Subject Headings: education body regions human activities
Microsoft Academic Graph classification: Upper limb muscle Repetition maximum Muscle volume Bench press Maximal strength Medicine Orthodontics business.industry Ball (bearing) business Training program Throwing
Library of Congress Subject Headings: lcsh:Medicine lcsh:R
Male, Muscle volume, muscle volume, Weight Lifting, Health Status, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Athletic Performance, Article, weightlifting exercises, Maximal strength, Throwing velocity, Upper Extremity, Young Adult, Healthy handball players, Humans, Muscle Strength, Muscle, Skeletal, Weightlifting exercises, Anthropometry, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, healthy handball players, Adipose Tissue, maximal strength, Body Composition, throwing velocity
Male, Muscle volume, muscle volume, Weight Lifting, Health Status, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Athletic Performance, Article, weightlifting exercises, Maximal strength, Throwing velocity, Upper Extremity, Young Adult, Healthy handball players, Humans, Muscle Strength, Muscle, Skeletal, Weightlifting exercises, Anthropometry, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, healthy handball players, Adipose Tissue, maximal strength, Body Composition, throwing velocity
Medical Subject Headings: education body regions human activities
Microsoft Academic Graph classification: Upper limb muscle Repetition maximum Muscle volume Bench press Maximal strength Medicine Orthodontics business.industry Ball (bearing) business Training program Throwing
Library of Congress Subject Headings: lcsh:Medicine lcsh:R
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).11 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).11 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
Citations provided by BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!- Keele University United Kingdom
- Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg
- Manouba University Tunisia
- University of Toronto Canada
- York University Canada
- Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg Germany
- MARTIN LUTHER UNIVERS-HALLE-WITTENBERG
- Qatar University Qatar
- Martin Luther Universitat Halle Wittenberg Germany
- University of Toronto Canada
0.16 L) were randomly allocated between experimental (EG) and control (CG) groups. Measures of one-repetition maximal strength included bench press, pull-over, snatch, and clean and jerk. Throwing velocity was investigated by standing, running, and jump throws, and the power of the upper limbs was estimated from the total distance of a 3-kg medicine ball overhead throw. Muscle volumes were estimated anthropometrically. Training sessions comprised 3&ndash
p2 = 0.920, with an almost 20% gain of muscle volume). It can be concluded that 8 weeks of biweekly in-season weightlifting training yielded substantial increases of muscle volume, maximal strength of the upper limbs, and ball throwing velocity in healthy handball players relative to their standard training program.
This study assessed the impact of 8 weeks biweekly in-season weightlifting training on the strength, throwing ability, and body composition of healthy male handball players. Twenty players (age: 21.2 ±
90% of 1RM (repetition maximum). Significant interaction effects (time x group) were found for all strength and throwing variables, ranging from &eta
d = 1.61) for the standing shot performance. Significant interaction effects were also detected for all anthropometric parameters (body mass: &eta
d = 6.65) and effect size (d = 6.44) for the medicine ball throw, and the smallest (about 23%, &Delta
p2 = 0.887 (medicine ball throw), with the largest between-group difference (more than 40%, &Delta
4 sets of explosive weightlifting exercise at 75%&ndash
1.4%, upper limb muscle volume: 3.16 ±
0.7 years, height: 1.83 ±
0.08 m, body mass: 83.3 ±
p2 = 0.595 (pull-over) to &eta
upper limb muscle volume: &eta
7.5 kg, body fat: 13.2 ±
body fat: &eta
p2 = 0.433
p2 = 0.391